The New York Times has ignored dozens of potential stories about Joe Biden’s bumbling and about Hunter Biden’s laptop, drug abuse, sexual escapades, virulent racism, pay-for-play schemes, and shady deals. Any Trump offspring involved in 1% of Hunter’s transgressions would generate virtually endless coverage in the Times.
Terror at the Top
In 90 years, has anything changed at The New York Times? In 1932 and 1933, the Times deliberately buried the story known as the ‘Terror-Famine’ that astoundingly killed at least 3.9 million Ukrainians, but by some estimates perhaps as many as 7.0 million. This equaled at least one out of every eight people, and possibly as much as one out of every four people.
Times editors were well-aware that the famine was orchestrated by Joseph Stalin, who forbade outside food and aid shipments, confiscated household food items, and restricted of the mobility of Ukranian citizens.
Why did Stalin do this to a region known as “the world’s breadbasket”? Because he wanted to punish independence-minded Ukrainians, quash anyone who represented a threat to his totalitarian government, and vanquish Ukraine’s small farms in favor of Soviet state-run collectives. Stalin lost no sleep over the legions of emaciated bodies, near death, scratching for any morsel of food they could find.
‘Mainstream’ and Maniacal
The New York Times chose to bury this heart-wrenching, world-shaking story. Then, as now, their Leftist bent was so intense and so all-encompassing that they couldn’t help themselves. The blunt truth is that they do not care who is hurt as long as socialist/Marxist/communist ideology prevails on Earth. Propping up the Biden Administration is an automatic reflex.
One hundred years from now, is it realistic to believe that the facade they place on the truth—the devious deceptions that the mainstream media, led by The New York Times, foist daily on Americans and on free people around the globe—will not continue to stand?
Or by some chance will their maniacal ideology finally be exposed by some new form of information dissemination, or some fundamental shift in media coverage?
Under Its Spell
It is difficult to fathom how detrimental their biased and slanted news coverage has been to humanity. Do you help anyone on Earth by propping up socialist, Marxist, or communist regimes for decades on end? Anyone except the bloodthirsty dictators, that is.
The mainstream press has held a news and information monopoly for so long, and has manipulated reality so skillfully, that the facade is not remotely understood or even recognized by those under its spell, despite it being bitterly denounced by those who see the mainstream press for what it really is. In the long run, truth generally prevails.
Even to this day, after five years of attempting to prove it, not a shred of evidence indicates that Donald Trump, his administration, or his campaign colluded in anyway with Russia. Still, you have Adam Schiff, Eric Swalwell, and all the other dolts in Congress who will readily appear on TV and spew lies. They play the ‘talking head’ game with sympathetic hosts and continue the guise, holding sway over those who don’t know how to find out the truth.
Before mass media, there has always been some entity that enforced its will upon the unwitting masses. Throughout history, dictators and other rulers imposed their version of the truth on their respective societies.
In the 21st century, roughly half of the United States and roughly half of the globe are entranced by Leftist manipulation. The stranglehold that the Left and the mainstream media have on humanity leads to some intriguing philosophical questions. Despite all the information sources that exist today, why does so much of the world still fall for manufactured and manipulated news? Why do otherwise intelligent people continue not only to believe, but to passionately defend demonstrably provable lies?
How can people keep tuning in to CNN or MSNBC, or for that matter the nightly news on ABC, NBC, or CBS? How many times does CBS have to be caught red-handed doctoring the news, slanting stories on 60 Minutes, and laying traps for people like Governor Ron DeSantis, only to be exposed? How many times does NBC have to get caught deceptively editing evidence and have to settle lawsuits? And then, within a matter of days, having learned nothing, to revert back to more of their invidious ways of presenting information?
Unfazed by Lies
How often can The New York Times offer a story that later proves to be completely untrue, and that its editors knew was untrue at the time of publication, before its core readership wakes up to the fact that they’re being lied to? Or is it that the lies simply don’t faze them? How can The New York Times continue to be regarded by many as the ‘newspaper of record,’ offering ‘All the News Fit to Print’ when it constantly has to print retractions when its lies are exposed? What tidal wave of human understanding, once and for all, needs to occur before we universally recognize highly biased news sources for what they are: propagandists?
In the United Kingdom, major news publications openly advocate a position, left or right, and don’t play ‘let’s pretend we’re unbiased.’ News consumers understand the bias that each media outlet or newspaper maintains, can read their articles, and judge them accordingly.
In the U.S., the mainstream press continues to perpetrate the lie that they offer an objective, balanced view of what’s happening in the world. They continue to do this because, sadly, enough fools buy what they say lock, stock, and barrel. Edward Bernays and Joseph Goebbels are laughing along with Stalin and Mao.